京剧演员崔馨月年龄:急，翻一篇文章，翻成英语

Basically, author's cultural difference put forward is dialectical, have places that can be discussed too itself. The author proposes the example like the earth in the article, it proves that does not " believes " that does not represent " not existing " to come, so ' various kinds of culture have different suggestion ' representative ' have objective moral standard '. But the example of such demonstration , mention ' the customs of different culture ' from ' the knowledge aspect that can know ', but two kinds of quite different situations; Because the earth form proves with various kinds of methods , can receive a correct answer finally; But the moral standard varies with each individual , changes with culture , even really there is a definitely objective truth, with which kind of culture is it a standard? The morals can not be verified as scientific knowledge.

In addition, since cultural relativism maintains that culture does not have the difference of quality, the behaviors of the slavery that the first point of üN mentioned and massacre Jew would have been a kind of culture and the ethnic group's social Darwinism; The author proposes that we should criticize the immoral behaviors of Nazi's Germany and slavery, but two situation these what was moulded under framework on ' culture have leaving good and bad ', because the two believe that one's own culture is superior to one kind of nationalities of its (not conform to the basic key element of cultural relativism ), so, perhaps we should inspect Nazi's Germany and causality of all sorts of savage act of slavery again . If world can generally adopt cultural relativism , perhaps that üN does not have above-mentioned questions produced .

The author does not agree to the argument of cultural relativism very much , he proposes accepting one of the cost of cultural relativism, it is ' we can go to criticize some another custom of society in ' morals ' on the inferiority one, because any objective standard does not exist. ' but cultural relativism will be held this argument, should think that every kind of culture has its originality and abundant value . Building constructing of every kind of culture, all have its unique historical background or relate to living environment, so any difference culture is compared , should not regard I clan's culture as the centre and criticize the values of other culture , custom and tradition of the culture that but should be different with the objective position , according to objective angle, not only it is assorted üN to see the cultural tradition of it , but also will form such a traditional custom for assorted üN to see, for different from one's own culture any , have one is it understand or not so-called objective standard existence that perhaps to sympathize with, no longer that üN is important.

The author emphasizes even should there is an ethical principle applicable to all in different culture, that is to say so-called ' general truth ', but this can only it says to be most people reached together common understanding in the world this perhaps, was that üN only admitted , it is the general truth by most people?

Basically, the cultural difference that the author puts forward is dialectical, itself have places that can be discussed too. the example of the earth's shape rised by the author in the article is to prove that " unbelievale " doesn't represent " unexisting ", so ' various culture lead to different opinions ' do not represent ' there is not objective moral standard ' . But the example of such demonstration , mention ' the customs of different culture ' from ' the knowledge aspect that can know ', but two kinds of quite different situations; Because the earth shape can be proved with various methods , can receive a correct answer finally; But the moral standard changes with each individual , changes with culture , even really there is a absolutely objective truth, with which kind of culture is as the standard? The morals can not be verified as scientific knowledge。
In addition, since cultural relativism maintains culture does not have the difference of quality, then behaviors of the slavery that the first point mentioned and massacre Jew would have been a kind of culture and the ethnic group's social Darwinism; The author proposes we should criticize the immoral behaviors of Germany of Nazi and slavery, but there two situations are molded under the framework of ' difference of quality about culture ' , because the two believe their own culture is superior toother races (not conform to the basic key element of cultural relativism ), so, perhaps we should inspect the causality of all sorts of savage act of Germany of Nazi and slavery again . If people can generally adopt cultural relativism , and perhaps the questions above would not appear.

The author does not agree to the argument of cultural relativism very much , he proposes accepting one of the cost of cultural relativism, it is ' we can not criticize any another social custom in ' morals ' for which is more inferior, because there are notany objective standards . ' but the cultural relativism hold this argument is because that every kind of culture has its originality and abundant value. the formation of every culture, all have its unique historical background or relate to living environment, so if we compare different cultures,we Should not take our own culture as the standard ,and Criticize others'culture.so we should be with objective position and objective angle in evaluating different custom and tradition of culture , not only depend on what its cultural tradition is , but also depends on why such a traditional custom was formed, for the culture different from one's own's , we should have one sympathize understanding, perhaps the objective standard which exists or not is no longer so important .
The author emphasizes even different culture should have an common moral principle , which is called ' general truth ', but perhaps this can only be the common understanding that this most people in the world reach together,and even it is a general truth when it is accepted by most people only?
我乱来的
你自己改改吧
呵呵