为什么百病皆由痰作祟:翻译！急急！

finally,the bank of china argues that district court erred in its award of damages and attorney's fees."a district court's damages award is a finding of fact ,which this court reviews for excessiveness using the clear error standard ." lebron v.u.s.279 f.3d 321 ,325 (5th cir . 2002)."the factual findings suppporting an award are reviewed de novo ." volk v. gonzalez ,262 f.3d 528,533(5th cir. 2001)
both parties admit that east girard sav.ass'n v.citizens nat.bank and trust co.593 f.2d 598 ,603 (5th cir 1979),allows a plaintiff in a wrongful dishonor case to recover the face value of a letter of credit .the bank of china contends that the east girard rude should be rejected in the instant case ,first it argues that voest-alpine's damages should be reduced by the amount it received on resale of the styrene monomer .however ,even if if the bank had authority for this proposition ,it cannot overcome the trial tesimony that voesst-alpine has not recovered any money by reselling the monomer.