腹黑诱拐小萌妻书包网:急！！跪求 英语三分钟演讲稿 题目 谈责任

责任

一个成功的人必然具备某些条件。其中之意是责任感。
固然，聪明、才智、学识、机缘等等，都是促成一个人成功的必要因素；但假如缺乏了责任感，他仍是不会成功的。
一个没有责任感的人，在工作时一定不会认真，对他的工作是否有成绩也不会喊细心地去检讨，也不愿去承担这工作成败的后果。他容易有推委的倾向，也比较懒惰和贪玩。他的聪明或许足可掩盖他工作上的事物或不圆满之处，在上级面前也很容易获得通过，甚至由于他的聪明圆滑，长于应酬，还可获得加薪或升级。但只因他缺少一种真正的责任感，日久天长，他的工作总难免因一再的疏漏而发生不良的后果。他由聪明圆滑而得来的信任也必不能维持久长。
我们相信，一个人即使聪明才智差一点，但假如他肯对工作负责，成功得计会也必定比只有聪明才智而无责任感得人要多。
对工作需要有责任感，对学业亦然。特别是对自己真正有兴趣，而打算做为终身事业的有关课程，更是要认真负责的去研读。单是用功，并不一定是有责任感。用功有时是为了考试，为了名次，为了学位或虚荣；真正的责任感应该是为了自己求知。为学业能做到这一点，学问就变成乐趣了。
一个人的责任感不一定要由大事去衡量。由平常小事也可表现出他的忠诚与负责。我们看一个人是否每天下班以前，把他的办公桌整理清爽；师傅肯把掉在地上的字纸随手捡起来；是否守时；当他有错误的时候，师傅勇于承认，立刻弥补；还是希图狡赖，委过别人，这不仅反映一个人的品德，也可预卜一个人的成败。
当你一天工作完了之后，你是否习惯去检讨一下它的成败得失呢？如果你有这项习惯，你就是一个负责的人了。因为惟有在检讨之后，你才可以发现错误或疏漏，才可及时去改正，或做下次工作的参考。事后的检讨是进步的来源，它并不是要你去做无益的追悔，而是要你从中获得可贵的经验。
对于工作，一时的热忱容易 ，持久的热忱困难。短暂的成功容易，持续的成功困难。必须时时求新，日日求进，避免自足自满。能够把工作视为与自己荣辱相关，祸福与共，才是真正了解成功之乐的人。

on responsibility

A successful person must have certain conditions. Which it is intended is a sense of responsibility.
Of course, smart, talents, knowledge, background, etc., are essential to a person's success; But if the lack of a sense of responsibility, he still would not succeed.
No one responsible person at work will not seriously, whether to his work performance will not shout to review carefully, and do not want to bear the consequences of the success or failure of this work. He easily has the tendency Selection Committee, a lazy and fun. Perhaps his smart enough to conceal his successful work of the Department of things or not, at the higher level also easily passed before, and even the smart smooth and evasive because he, too social, receive a salary increase or promotion. But just because he lacked a real sense of responsibility, long days, his work is the total omission occurred as a result of repeated negative consequences. He obtained by the smart smooth and evasive to the trust will also not be able to maintain long long.
We believe that if a person wisdom went, but if he is willing to work for, will also be successful he could always only wisdom than people without a sense of responsibility. Need to be responsible for the work of their true. Especially for their genuine interest, and to serve as a lifelong career on courses, but it is also necessary to study conscientiously responsible. Shan is hard, is not necessarily responsible. Sometimes hard to test, in order to test, in order to graduate or vanity; Genuine sense of responsibility should be to their knowledge. For the academic to do this, learning becomes fun.
A person need not be the responsibility of the event to measure. From the normal matter can demonstrate his loyalty and responsibility. We look at whether a person from the previous day to his desk sorting comfortable; Chef to the words paper readily fall to the ground to pick up; Whether punctuality; When he had the wrong time, chef to recognize immediately remedy; Or attempt deny that the appointment of others, not only reflect a person's character can predict a person's success. When you work the day after, you are accustomed to review its success or failure? If you have this habit, you are a responsible person. Because only in the review, you can find errors or omissions, to be promptly corrected, or so the next working reference.
After the review is the source of progress, it does not mean that you do not let the, but you derive valuable experience. For, 1:00 enthusiasm easy lasting enthusiasm difficulties.
Transient success easy, sustained success difficult. Must always become thrilled with novelty, into day to avoid self-sufficiency complacent. Able to work with their honor as relevant, good common truly understand the joy of the success.

责任有很多种,比如个人责任,事业责任,公司对社会的责任等等.这里给你一篇个人责任的文章,内容很长,超过三分钟,可以自己删一点.

"Taking Personal Responsibility" by Brian Tracy

Did you ever stop to think that everything you are or ever will be is completely up to you? Just imagine! You are where you are because of who you are. Everything that exists in your life exists because of you, because of your behavior, words and actions. Because you have freedom of choice and because you have chosen each and every circumstance of your life, you are completely responsible for all of your success and failure, your happiness and unhappiness, your present and future.

That thought is like a parachute jump: It’s scary and exhilarating at the same time. It’s one of the biggest and most important ideas that can ever occur to you, or anyone else. The acceptance of personal responsibility is what separates the adult from the child. It’s the great leap forward into maturity. Responsibility is the hallmark of the fully integrated, fully functioning human being. Responsibility goes hand in hand with success, achievement, motivation, happiness and self-actualization. It’s the absolute minimum requirement for the accomplishment of everything you could ever really want in life. Accepting that you’re completely responsible for yourself and realizing that no one is coming to the rescue is the beginning of peak performance. There’s very little that you cannot do or have after you accept that “If it’s to be, it’s up to me!”

The opposite of accepting responsibility is making excuses and blaming people and things for what’s going on in your life. And since everything we do is a matter of habit, if people get into the habit of making excuses, they get into the habit of evading responsibility at the same time. If they set a goal or objective for themselves, they immediately create an excuse that they hold in reserve just in case the accomplishment of the goal is too difficult or requires more self-discipline and persistence than they had thought. As soon as things start to go poorly, irresponsible people trot out their excuse and let themselves off the hook. But that won’t get them anywhere in the long run.

A basic law of human life was first espoused by Socrates more than 400 years before Christ. It’s called the Law of Causality. We call it the Law of Cause and Effect. It states that for every effect in your life, there’s a cause. If there’s any effect that you desire, or desire more of, you can trace it back to the cause, and by duplicating the cause, you can have the effect.

For example, everyone wants to be healthy. If you set a high level of physical health and energy as your goal, or the desired effect, you can have it simply by finding out the cause, by finding out what other healthy and energetic people do with regard to diet, exercise and rest, and by doing the same thing. If you do, you’re likely to get the same result. This is no miracle. It sounds simple, but in many cases, it’s one of the hardest things in the world to do.

Unhappiness is an effect as well. If you wish to be happy, the first thing to do is to decide for yourself the kind of life situation in which you would feel wonderful. Think of the very best times of your life, and think of what you were doing, where you were doing it, and the people you were with at the time. Then write out, in complete detail, a description of your ideal lifestyle. Now you have defined the effect that you desire.

Next, look at your current life and ask yourself, “What are all the things in my life that are inconsistent with the lifestyle that would make me happy?” In other words, look at the causes of the effects that you don’t like. Then make a decision to begin alleviating or removing those causes, one by one, until what you have left is the kind of life you want to live.

Your thoughts are extremely powerful. They have the power to raise and lower your blood pressure, your pulse rate and your respiratory rate. They can affect your digestion. And if your thoughts are strong enough, they can even make you sick or healthy. Your thoughts tend to trigger images in your mind, and the feelings in your body are consistent with them. If you think or read happy, healthy thoughts, you will have happy, healthy pictures and experience happy, healthy emotions. As Deepak Chopra points out in his audiocassette program Magical Mind, Magical Body, every part of your mind is connected to every single part of your body in a complex web of messages and impulses that affect everything you feel, say and do.

Only you can think your thoughts, only you can decide what you’ll dwell upon, what you’ll read and listen to, who you’ll associate with and the conversations you’ll engage in; therefore, you are totally responsible for all the consequences of all those behaviors. It’s unavoidable.

Perhaps the most important part of the subject of self-responsibility involves your happiness and your peace of mind. There seems to be a direct relationship between responsibility and happiness on the one hand, and irresponsibility and unhappiness on the other hand. Let me explain.

First of all, the key to happiness is having a sense of control over what’s going on in your life. The more you feel that you’re in control, the happier you’ll be. Men and women who have risen to the top of their organizations tend to be far happier than people further down. This is because they feel far more in control of their destinies, far more capable of making decisions and taking action. The more responsibility you take in your company, the more power, authority and respect you’ll receive. One of the smartest things you can do is to take responsibility for the most important concerns of your boss.
The more you accept responsibility for getting results in the areas that your boss considers most important, the more valuable and indispensable you’ll become in your organization. People who want more money and more respect often think that they can get it simply by asking for it or by politicking.

The truth is that it will accrue to you rapidly as soon as you “step up to the plate” and undertake responsibility for results in your organization. The most respected people in any company are those who are the most capable of getting the most important jobs done on schedule.

The more responsibility you take, the more in control you are. And the freer you are, especially in your own mind, to make decisions and to do the things you want to do. So there’s a direct relationship between responsibility, control, freedom and happiness.

The happiest people in the world are those who feel absolutely terrific about themselves, and this is the natural outgrowth of accepting total responsibility for every part of their lives.

At the other end of the spectrum, there is irresponsibility, or the failure to accept responsibility. Each person is somewhere in between, moving toward a higher level of responsibility or irresponsibility with every word and every decision.

In fact, a good definition of insanity is total irresponsibility, to the point of needing a straitjacket and a padded cell. Thomas Szasz, the great psychoanalyst, once wrote, “There is no such thing as insanity. There are only varying levels of irresponsibility.”

A person who is completely irresponsible is subject to anger, hostility, fear, resentment, doubt-all sorts of negative emotions. And here’s why. All negative emotions tend to be associated with blame. Fully 99 percent of all our problems exist only because we’re able to blame someone or something for them. The instant we stop blaming, our negative emotions begin disappearing.

What’s the antidote to blaming? It’s simple! Since your mind can hold only one thought at a time, either positive or negative, you can override the tendency to blame and become angry simply by saying, firmly, “I am responsible!”

You can’t accept responsibility for a situation and be angry at the same time. You can’t accept responsibility and be unhappy or upset. The acceptance of responsibility negates negative emotions and short-circuits any tendencies toward unhappiness.

The very act of accepting responsibility calms your mind and clarifies your vision. It soothes your emotions and enables you to think more positively and constructively. In fact, the acceptance of responsibility often gives you insight into what you should do to resolve the situation.

Here’s an exercise: Look at the most common problems and difficulties that people have in life. Apply this simple remedy of accepting responsibility to each one, and see what happens.

People have problems with other people-their spouses, their children, their friends, their coworkers and their bosses. Someone once said that almost all of our problems in life have hair on top, come on two legs and talk back. So think of the people in your life who cause you any stress or anxiety and ask yourself who is responsible. Are they responsible for being in your life, or are you responsible for having them in your life?

According to the Law of Attraction, you’re a living magnet in that you invariably attract people into your life who harmonize with your dominant thoughts and emotions. The people in your life are there because you’ve attracted them by the person you are, by the thoughts you hold, by the emotions you experience. If you’re not happy with the people surrounding you, you’re responsible. You’re attracting them, and you’re keeping them there.

Let me give you an example. I have four beautiful children. For a long time, when my children were behaving in ways that I felt were inappropriate, I had a tendency to blame or criticize them. However, the more I studied child raising and learned about the subject, the more I found that children are almost totally reactive.

Their behaviors are almost always responses to what is going on around them and to their relationships with their parents. So I began asking the question, “What is it in me that is causing my child to act this way?” As soon as I turned the question around, and looked to myself for the reason-in effect, accepted complete responsibility for my children’s behavior-I was able to see what I might be doing, or not doing, that my children were reacting to. Perhaps I wasn’t spending enough one-on-one time with them. Perhaps I wasn’t listening to them when they wanted to talk. Perhaps I was too quick to question their report cards.

I began to apply that simple principle to every other part of my life as well. I began asking, “What is it in me that is causing this external situation?”

If the Law of Correspondence is true (and it is), and everything that is happening to you on the outside is due to something that is happening to you on the inside, then the first place to look is within. As soon as you do that, you begin to see things that you had completely missed when you were busy blaming others and making excuses. You begin to see that you’re responsible in large measure for the things that are happening to you.

If you’re in a bad relationship, who got you there? You likely weren’t marched into the relationship and kept there at gunpoint. So it’s largely a matter of free will and free choice on your part. If you’re not happy, it’s up to you to do something about it. As Henry Ford II once said, “Never complain, never explain.” If you’re not happy with the situation, do something about it. If you’re not willing to do something about it, then don’t complain.

There’s the story of the construction worker who opens up his lunch box at the noon break and unwraps his sandwich to find that it contains sardines. He gets really upset and complains loudly to everyone around him about how much he hates sardines. The next day, the same thing happens: a sardine sandwich. Again, the construction worker shouts and complains about how much he hates sardines for lunch. The third day it happens again. By this time, his fellow workers are getting fed up with his loud complaining. One of them leans over and says to him, “If you hate sardines so much, why don’t you tell your wife to make you some other kind of sandwich?” The construction worker turns to the fellow and says, “Oh, I’m not married. I make my own lunches!”

Many of us get into the same situation as the construction worker’s and complain about circumstances that are almost entirely of our own making. Is this true for you? Look over your relationships and ask where this might be true in your life.

Are you happy with your job? Are you happy with the amount of money you’re earning? Are you happy with your level of responsibility and your activities each day? If you’re not, you need to accept that you’re completely responsible for every aspect of your job and your career.

Why? Because you chose it freely. You took the job, you assumed the responsibilities, and you accepted the wage. If you’re not happy with any of them, for any reason, then it’s up to you to do something different.

You’re earning today exactly what you’re worth-not a penny more, not a penny less. In life, we tend to get exactly what we deserve. If you’re not satisfied with the amount you’re getting, look around you, at people who are doing the kind of work you would like to do and earning the kind of money you would like to earn. Ask them what they’re doing differently from what you’re doing. What are the causes of the effects they’re getting? Once you know what they are, accept complete responsibility for your situation, apply your wonderful mind and abilities, back them with willpower and self-discipline, and get busy making the changes you need to make to enjoy the life you want to enjoy.

Your great aim in life is to develop character. Character is composed of self-esteem, self-discipline, the ability to delay gratification, and the willingness to accept full responsibility for your life and everything in it. The more you say to yourself, “I am responsible,” the stronger, better and finer a person you become. And every part of your life will improve at the same time.

SORRY,这个我比你更没经验,帮不了你

Law based on individual responsibility
The common law of England, developed by the judges, was developed in
accordance with basic moral principles. These moral principles, basically
the moral code of Christianity, are mirrored in the other great religions.
There is a core set of rules of conduct which is common to all the great
religions. The principles which formed the basis of the English common law
include honesty, keeping promises, the pursuit of truth, responsibility,
duty, fairness in interpersonal relations, concern for one's neighbours,
respect for property, loyalty and duty to one's spouse and children, the
work ethic and keeping one's word. The emphasis is upon the duty and
responsibility of the individual. No society can function efficiently or
humanely and no civilisation can endure without these values. They are
values for individuals - not for society.
Common law liability is based on fault and individual responsibility.
It is axiomatic that a person should not be disadvantaged or punished
except for fault - intentional, reckless or negligent wrongdoing (strict
liability applying in exceptional circumstances). The idea of fault is the
golden thread that runs through the fabric of the traditional legal order.
The Magna Carta contains one of its early manifestations, but the whole of
the common law relating to crimes, civil obligations and property rights
is characterised by the notion that fault underlies punishment or
deprivation. A system of sanctions based on fault presupposes known and
pre-existing standards of conduct which bind the community.
Law based on individual moral responsibility provided a limited role
for law. A significant part of modern law is not based on fault. Laws
based on equality, fairness and social justice considerations have led to
a massive expansion of law. Individual responsibility has been overlaid by
social responsibility.
The modern reform tradition has undermined the original values and
institutions. It is not suggested that the old values and institutions
should remain inviolate and unchanged. Modern conditions require change
and action by legislation is essential. The problem with modern reform is
that it has not taken account of the basic underlying values and
institutions of the tradition and particularly the important principle of
the common law that law must be based on fault. The individual is not
responsible under the common law in any way unless there was some act of
wrongdoing - that wrongdoing could be based on negligence, recklessness,
intentionally committed harm or reasonably foreseeable harm (strict
liability). Modern legislation has departed from that basic principle and
there has been a big explosion of law. I do not have time to illustrate
and explain this proposition.
Other important dimensions in the common law are (i) law attempted to
prevent men from doing harm and did not try to make man good, and (ii) law
emphasised duties not rights.
The emphasis in the traditional law defined above is upon the duty and
responsibility of the individual. The law regulates conduct which is
morally blameworthy. No society can function efficiently or humanely and
no civilisation can endure without these values.
The failure to assume responsibility for one's actions and the
tendency to look to government for everything leads to big government and
the undermining of traditional morality.
Traditional morality is inestimably important. Without it, all kinds
of injustices and oppressions against individual persons are sanctioned;
not the distorted and imaginary oppressions of Marxist theory, but the
real oppressions which arise when men forget the golden rule: love your
neighbour as yourself.
The abandonment of traditional morality leads to expropriation of
private property, heavy taxation, theft, waste, compulsory association,
totalitarian thought control, sexual exploitation, homeless children,
fraud and dishonesty, disloyalty to family, ever increasing government
power and control, envy, indiscipline, laziness, individual
irresponsibility, indecency, rudeness, impoliteness, social engineering
and genocide, not to mention impiety.
The values of a society derive from its spiritual and moral
foundations. When those foundations are destroyed a vacuum exists and
people can be manipulated according to the ideology and power ambitions of
ruling elites.
I do not support the introduction of religion and theology into
politics, law and constitutionalism. Any attempt to include religious and
theological concepts into constitutionalism, law and politics is likely to
be divisive and will raise a host of practical problems. A completely
different dimension is the need to infuse basic principles of morality
common to all religions into the lives of the actors in constitutionalism,
law and politics.
The dominance and corrupting influence of the established church in
politics, caused reactions in western philosophical thought and action.
The battle to remove established religion out of state and civil society
has unfortunately also lead to a decline in standards of morality. The
core problem of western society (indeed organised society all over the
world) is the decline of morality. The root cause of so many problems
surely is the decline of morality at all levels in society. Unless this is
arrested, decline at all levels will continue. Yet academics and the
politicians in the western world while analysing human problems scarcely
focus on the moral roots of so many problems.
It is something I wonder about often when I sit at academic
conferences or read learned writings. Academics talk and write about
rights and reforms without any reference to the moral roots of so many
problems. Proposals for reform are common in politics, education and
media. But can there be worthwhile reform without, for example, honesty?
This is an issue which the reformers ignore.