剑风传奇狂战士图片:十二万火急求高手帮助英翻中~

来源:百度文库 编辑:高校问答 时间:2024/05/09 13:14:47
哪位大仙帮我翻译一下啊~十分感谢!
The point was forcefully made to me by a Midwestern executive who has given a good deal of thought to the question: “So long as a businessman complies with the laws of the land and avoids telling malicious lies, he’s ethical. If the laws as written gives a man a wide-open chance to make a killing he’d be a fool not to take advantage of it. If he doesn’t, somebody else will. There’s no obligation on him to stop and consider who is going to get hurt. If the law says he can do it, that’s all the justification he needs. There’s nothing unethical about that. It’s just plain business sense.”
The illusion that business can afford to he guided by ethics as conceived in private life is often fostered by speeches and articles containing such phrases as, “It pays to be ethical,” or “Sound ethics is good business.” Actually this is not an ethical position at all; it is a self-serving calculation in disguise. The speaker is really saying that in the long run a company can make more money if it does not antagonize competitors, suppliers, employees, and customers by squeezing them too hard. He is saying that over sharp policies reduce ultimate gains. That is true, but it has nothing to do with ethics.

有人向我提出有力的行政人员加起来也有很多思考这样一个问题:"只要是符合商人法的土地,避免对恶意的谎言,他的道德. 如果法律给予一个人写了敞开的机会,把被打死的傻瓜he'd不利用它. 如果他好像,别人会. 没有停止,他有义务考虑谁来揽. 如果能做到这一点,他说法,这是他所需要的一切道理. 没什么不道德的态度. 只是简单的商业意识" 以为企业可以按照他所设想的道德私生活常常培育讲话和文章,载这种说法:"这是道德付费"或"良好的商业道德好" 其实这并不是一种道德立场; 这是自私变相计算. 发言人说真的,从长远来看,公司可以赚更多的钱,如果不对抗竞争对手、供应商、员工、客户和他们太辛苦了挤压. 他说,在大幅削减政策的最终成果. 这是事实,但与道德无关