七彩虹gt610显卡驱动:这短英文帮我翻译一下,感激!!!

3. Results
Participants' mean score on Lay's Procrastination Scale was 59.48 with a standard deviation of
11.78. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89. Based on the distribution of procrastination scores, respon-
dents were categorised in one of three classes of subjects: (1) low procrastinators with a Procras-
tination Scale score lower than 53 (N=90), (2) mid-procrastinators whose Procrastination Scale
score ranged from 53 to 63 (N=107), and (3) high procrastinators with a Procrastination Scale
score higher than 63 (N=105).
As the mental simulation task of the motivation study requested subjects to imagine studying
in a trimester system, only respondents actually studying in a trimester system (N=148) were
used for the remainder of the present study. These respondents included 88 female and 60 male
students. Their mean Procrastination Scale scores were 56.40 and 61.08, respectively (P=0.02).
Although most authors, if at all, report the absence of any signi?cant gender e?ect (Ferrari,
1994), the modest gender e?ect in the present study has been observed before in the same popu-
lation, using the same measurement instrument; in a sample of 278 university students the mean
Procrastination Scale scores were 57.28 and 62.06 (P<0.01) for female and male students,
respectively (Schouwenburg, 1991). For the time being, however, the nature of this e?ect remains
unclear.
The Procrastination Scale score of 52 low procrastinators averaged 46.25 (range=33±52); the average score of 53 mid-procrastinators averaged 58.85 (range=53±63), and the average score of 43 high procrastinators averaged 72.19 (range=64±98).
Mental simulation as requested proved a di?cult task, especially in di?erentiating among the various sub-tasks. The time-series generated correlated considerably (Table 1), indicating a ?rm response bias: evidently, di?erentiating among the various situations of temptation seemed to behard. We will therefore average the ?ve temptation situations to one generalised situation of social temptation.